Legal Opinion
United States v. James Daychild, United States of America v. Patrick O. Neiss
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 17, 2004No. 02-30184, 02-30435PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Co-defendants James Daychild and Patrick Neiss had the bad judgment not only to plan a venture of unlawful drug distribution, but also to sell five pounds of illegal drugs to a government informant. The marijuana-for-money exchange resulted in a search of Neiss’s home, where Daychild also had resided for a week or two. There, law enforcement agents found what they sought and perhaps more: firearms, including an unregistered machine gun, and an additional seven to eight pounds of marijuana. After a jury trial, Daychild and Neiss were both convicted in the United States…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- United States v. Pascual Dionicio JeronimoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Francisco Jimenez Recio, United States of America v. Adrian Lopez-MezaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Anthony GadsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Osama Musa AlferahinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.