Legal Opinion
Daoud v. Matz
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 4, 1954PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
73 So.2d 51 (1954)
DAOUD et al.
v.
MATZ.
Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.
June 4, 1954.
Danton & Lazar and Hubbard & Everett, Miami, for appellant.
Nichols, Gaither, Green, Frates & Beckham and M. Dudley Burton, Miami, and Rodney Durrance, Tallahassee, for appellee.
SEBRING, Justice.
This proceeding involves a controversy between an employee and his employer, under the Workmen's Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., regarding the extent to which payments made in advance of a compensation award should be credited on the award.
The record reflects that on August 25, 1953, the employee Matz, in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sweat v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HayTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Tulsa Rolling Mills Co. v. KrejciSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- State Compensation Ins. Fund v. PillsburyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
- Modern Equipment Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by13 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Climate Control, Inc. v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Schel v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Structural Systems, Inc. v. WorthenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Wilson v. Pest Control Commission of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.