Legal Opinion

Climate Control, Inc. v. Hill

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1959No. 6177, 6414PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

This consolidated appeal has as its primary objective the testing of the lawfulness of certain premium rates fixed by The Industrial Commission of Arizona for a class of policyholders hereinafter referred to as “self-raters.” Appellant, in its complaint in the court below, Cause No. 6177, stated three claims for relief. All claims were dismissed in response to motions by appellees. Thereupon, appellant appeared before the Commission, asserting that the order establishing the rates for premiums for the self-raters was unreasonable and unlawful. From an adverse decision…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Day v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Frank C. Sparks Co. v. Huber Baking Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  4. Industrial Commission v. Arizona Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Brandes v. MitterlingArizona Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Smith v. BohannanArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Cutter Aviation, Inc. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Industrial Commission v. Harbor Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  5. John Terrell v. Ruby TorresArizona Supreme Court · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API