Sweat v. Allen
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
This appeal presents the ultimate question of whether or not Ray F. Allen, the appellee and claimánt, is entitled to the benefits of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Ch. 17481, Acts of 1935, as amended by Ch. 18413, Acts of 1937.. By the nature of his employment, the claimant, a deputy sheriff, was subject to being called to duty at any hour of the day or night by notification from one of his fellow employees or the sheriff, his employer, for which he' was paid a straight salary per month' regardless of the number of hours he worked. Under his contract, it was shown that his employer could…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Wirta v. North Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HayTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Wilson v. Rowan Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Naranja Rock Co. v. Dawal FarmsSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Protectu Awning Shutter Co. v. ClineSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Strother v. Morrison CafeteriaSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Lang v. William Bros Boiler & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.