Legal Opinion

Droppers v. Marshall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1919No. Docket No. 82PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Kent; McDonald, J. Assumpsit by Anthony C. Droppers against Ernest W. Marshall for breach of a land contract. Judgment for plaintiff.- Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

This is an action brought to recover damages for the breach of a written contract. The case has been in this court before, and is reported in 203 Mich. 173. Upon being retried, a verdict was had in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the sum of $1,343.19, upon which verdict judgment was duly entered. The description of the premises in the contract is as follows:

“All that certain piece or parcel of land situate in the township of Byron, in' the county of Kent and State of Michigan, described as follows, viz.: The east *561half of the southeast quarter and the southeast quarter of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Quinnin v. ReimersMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Shears v. WestoverMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Tuthill v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Redding v. RozellMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Droppers v. MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. PiersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Benedek v. Mechanical Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Johnston v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Atlas v. Gunsberg Packing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Beltsman v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API