Legal Opinion · Dissent

Droppers v. Marshall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1918No. Docket No. 46PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Kent; McDonald, J. Assumpsit by Anthony C. Droppers against Ernest W. Marshall for breach of a land contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1DissentOstrander, C. J.

The defendant owned 119 acres of land. Under date December 5, 1916, he and plaintiff executed a writing, by the terms of which he was to sell and plaintiff to buy the land and some personal property for $16,000, vupon certain terms. The terms of payment were $500 December 5, 1916, and this was paid; $500 on or before March 1, *1741917, when a note and mortgage for the balance was to be given, to draw interest at the rate of 5 per cent, per annum, to be paid, $100, plus interest, annually, with the privilege of paying more than $100. The land is described in the writing as being in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Way v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Phillips v. StauchMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Allen v. AtkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Dikeman v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hall v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Strahan v. HaynesArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Droppers v. MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Lamberts v. LemleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Bucuss v. SchulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API