Legal Opinion

Redding v. Rozell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Berrien. (Smith, J.) Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Morse,-J.

The main parties to this controversy are the same as in the case of Rozell v. Redding, 59 Mich., 331, only their positions as parties are inverted. The defendant, James H. Bedding, who is now the husband of Jane, who was once the wife of Henry Bozell, it is conceded has no interest in the suit, and was only made a party, nominally, because of his being used as an instrument in the conveyance sought to be rectified by complainant’s bill of complaint.

Much of the evidence in the two cases is identical, and is outlined in the opinion in Rozell v. Redding. It will be necessary, therefore,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rozell v. ReddingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shears v. WestoverMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Droppers v. MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Tuthill v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Harlow v. JasephMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Miller v. BeardsleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API