Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Mathesen

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 11, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The main proceeding in which the present motion is made is one of replevin against an administratrix pursuant to the provisions of section 206-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act. The petition alleges “ that there is certain money and other personal property of your petitioner above named, to wit; Five Thousand ($5,000.00) dollars and a walrus bag with its contents, which should be delivered to your petitioner and which is now in the possession of [the administratrix] and who withholds such possession from your petitioner.” Formal allegations to the effect that the petitioner is the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SmallmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  2. In Re Proving the Will of FraschNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Davis v. . CrandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. In re the Estate of EnrightNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of TailerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LearyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  2. In re the Estate of KenneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  3. In re the Estate of SichelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. In re the Estate of JacobsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  5. In re the Estate of KleinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API