Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Klein

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 11, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

In the opinion of the court the learned referee has overlooked the basic theory underlying section 206-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act. The history of this enactment, was recounted in Matter of Mathesen (161 Misc. 367, 369, 370). It was merely a particular codification of the authority which this court had previously asserted and exercised in Matter of Enright (149 Misc. 353) of compelling its fiduciaries to do justice to all men in respect to the affairs of their decedents.

In the present case it is amply established, the administratrix has admitted, and the referee has found, that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Raymond v. Estate of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. In re the Estate of EnrightNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of MathesenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of UlrichNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  2. In re the Estate of Van DerpoolNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API