In re the Estate of Jacobs

Wingate, S.

The present motion for reargument indicates a misconception by the respondent Misrok respecting the nature and scope of the remedy contemplated by section 206-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act. This is available only where a claimant ;is entitled to unqualified and immediate possession of identified personal property, or if it has been sold, to the proceeds thereof, wherefore, .if .it .is subject, as .is .asserted in the present instance, to an unsatisfied *640lien, the remedy is unavailable. (Matter of Kenney, 171 Misc. 87, 89.)

Perhaps the conception of this respondent on the subject…