State v. Bridges
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
The State of Maine appeals from an order of the Superior Court, Washington County, suppressing self-incriminating statements made to a police officer by the defendant Edmund R. Bridges for failure to warn Bridges as prescribed by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The State contends the trial court erroneously determined Bridges was in custody at the time he made the statements. We hold the court reached a proper determination as to custody and affirm the order.
I
This case comes before us for a second time on the State's appeal of pretrial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BleylSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. PrestonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- State v. GardnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HewesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- State v. CandageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- State v. LavoieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- State v. JalbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- State v. YoungSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.