Legal Opinion

State v. Preston

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 21, 1980PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODFREY, Justice.

The defendants, Dale and Wallace Preston, were jointly indicted for burglary, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401 (Supp.1979) and theft, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 353 (Supp.1979). The Superior Court, Washington County, granted in part their pretrial motion to suppress certain evidence. The State appeals pursuant to 15 M.R.S.A. § 2115-A (Supp.1965-78) and Rule 37A(d), M.R.Crim.P., contending that certain admissions to the police made by the defendants are not excludable despite the fact that the police did not give Miranda warnings. Even if Miranda warn ings were required, the State urges that certain…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BleylSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. State v. PhilbrickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. State v. GravelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. State v. AyersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API