Legal Opinion

State v. Bleyl

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 29, 1981PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODFREY, Justice.

Alleging that various constitutional and evidentiary errors were committed at their joint trial, Richard Bleyl, David Chamberlain and Mark Coyne have brought this consolidated appeal from judgments of conviction for manslaughter, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 203(1)(A), burglary, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401(2)(B), and robbery, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 651(1)(C), entered in the Superior Court, Androscoggin County. We affirm the judgments of conviction of manslaughter, burglary and robbery of the defendants Chamberlain and Coyne. We affirm the judgment of conviction of burglary of the defendant Bleyl but…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  2. Gabow v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. CaouetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. State v. LockhartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  5. State v. DeLongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API