Legal Opinion
Britton v. Bryson
California Supreme Court
Decided September 22, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 11598PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Action to quiet title to certain lots situated in the county of Los Angeles was commenced by plaintiff, Sophie Britton, against John Henry Britton, as her husband, and one D. C. Hammell. Immediately prior to the institution of this action John Henry Britton had conveyed said property to said D. C. Hammell by a gift deed, and plaintiff sought, as the wife of John Henry Britton, to have said property declared to be the community property of herself and John Henry Britton, and a judgment that D. C. Hammell owned no interest therein. During the pendency of the action John Henry Britton…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Atherton v. AthertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Hunt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
- Britton v. HammellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Raps v. RapsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.