State v. Hunley
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Worswick, A.C.J.
f 1 — A jury found Monte Hunley guilty of attempting to elude a police vehicle. Hunley appeals, arguing (1) that defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to request a lesser included offense instruc*923tion for reckless driving and (2) that provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act1 (SRA) unconstitutionally relieve the State of its burden of proof at sentencing. Holding that reckless driving is not a lesser included offense in attempting to elude a police vehicle and that the challenged SRA provisions violate due process, we affirm Hunley’s conviction and remand…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HunleyWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- State Of Washington v. Robert MaddausCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State Of Washington v. Robert MaddausCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.