Legal Opinion

Bank of Bethesda v. Koch

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 7, 1979No. 288, September Term, 1979PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLowe, J.

In a letter “To Number 1365” declining once more to sanction a dramatization of “Tom Sawyer”, Mark Twain once wrote of a fictitious experience as a western college professor, whereupon a Piute squaw intending to honor him named her baby for him, “a voluntary compliment” which pleased him greatly but brought about devastating and unforeseen consequences. 1 Such an honor the Bank of Bethesda seeks to have us bestow upon a statutory “Injun”, legislatively referred to as a “charging order”, which the Bank would have us redenominate a “judicial assignment”.

Because a limited partner’s interest in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lambert v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. Gilman Paint & Varnish Co. v. LegumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. Montgomery County v. Ian Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. McDowell, Pyle & Co. v. HopfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weddell v. H2O, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Madison Hills Ltd. Partnership II v. Madison Hills, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. United National Insurance v. Waterfront N.Y. Realty Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Green v. Bellerive Condominiums Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API