Legal Opinion

Building and Loan Association v. . Swaim

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 27, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

It is not suggested that the estate of A. R. Swaim is not liable for the alleged deficiency in his account with the plaintiff; but the money paid Mrs. Swaim as the beneficiary of the policy issued by th^ Columbian National Life Insurance Company is her individual property and is not subject’to the payment of the debts of the deceased or to distribution as a part of the assets of his estate. Constitution, Art. X/ sec. 7; Burwell v. Snow, 107 N. C., 82; Cutchin v. Johnston, 120 N. C., 51. The only question for decision is whether the defendant’s note is supported by a valuable consideration or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maull v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
  2. Hunt v. . EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Smathers v. Toxaway Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. American Exchange National Bank v. SeagrovesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Long v. . RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stonestreet v. Southern Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Taft v. . CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Bank of Lewiston v. HarringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Isaacs v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Willis Byerly v. Duke Power Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API