Rector v. Shirk
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Wabash Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
This was a suit to redeem land sold on foreclosure of a mortgage. The year for redemption had expired before suit brought.
The complaint was in two paragraphs, to each of which a demurrer for want of'facts sufficient was sustained.
Judgment was rendered upon the demurrers, and the plaintiffs, who were husband and wife, appealed.
They assigned for error the sustaining of said demurrers.
There was no exception taken to the ruling on the demur*32rer to the first paragraph of the complaint; therefore, the error assigned on that ruling presents no question. Hutts v. Hutts, 62 Ind. 214.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wight v. Shelby RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1855
- Butt v. ButtIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Griffin v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1849
- Carter v. ZenblinIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Hutts v. HuttsIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ransdel v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. VandenbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Cox v. RatcliffeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Beatty v. BrummettIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Holzman v. HibbenIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.