Legal Opinion

Holzman v. Hibben

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1884No. 11,354PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

Appellees sued appellants on account for goods sold and delivered. A joint demurrer was overruled to the complaint, and appellants each filed a separate general denial. There was a trial by jury,-verdict for the plaintiffs,, and over a motion for a new trial judgment was rendered upon the verdict.

The errors assigned are, overruling the demurrer to the complaint, rendering judgment against appellants for all the-costs of the term, and overruling the motion for a new trial.

The demurrer to the complaint is joint by all the defendants, and only for the cause of the want of sufficient…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Maple v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Lipperd v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Harris v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Nave v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Martin v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. VandenbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Brown v. CritchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. CosbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Ervin v. State ex rel. WalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API