Dykes v. Wyman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa. (Arnold, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Mouse J.
In 1880 the plaintiff was the owner and master of a vessel at Grand Haven, Michigan, incumbered by a mortgage of nearly 82,000.
He applied to defendants to loan him a sufficient amount to pay this mortgage, which, after much solicitation, they did; and on the fourteenth day of January, 1880, to secure them for this loan, the plaintiff gave defendants two promissory notes, one for 8966, payable December 1, 1880, and the other for 8966.98, due December 1, 1881, with interest at 10 per cent., which notes were secured by mortgage upon the vessel.
A contract, bearing date the same day, was…
2Cited by7 opinions
- McNaughton v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Wright v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- McCann v. TwitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1917
- Bamlet Realty Co. v. DoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Doppke v. American Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.