Fields v. a & B ELECTRONICS
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ALMA WILSON, Justice:
The single issue before this Court is the timeliness of this appeal. We granted cer-tiorari to inquire into the jurisdictional time period in this case and find this appeal was timely commenced on the final day of the limitation period.
The parties did not raise any question as to the jurisdiction of the Court. The Court of Appeals, sua sponte, noted that the Petition for. Review was filed in the Office of the Clerk of this Court on the twenty-second day after the mailing of the trial judge’s order, which Petitioner seeks to be reviewed.
Appellate proceedings for review of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. ChambleeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- In Re Initiative Petition Filed November 15, 1983Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Baird v. Independent School District No. 3 of Woodward CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- David v. Pennwalt Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Turrell v. Continental Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
3Cited by18 opinions
- Oklahoma Oncology & Hematology P.C. v. US Oncology, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- HALL v. THE GEO GROUP, INCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Red Rock Mental Health v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Baptist Medical Center of Oklahoma, Inc. v. AguirreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.