Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Chamblee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 22, 1940No. 24486PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This cause originated in the district court of Tulsa county. It involves the disposition of funds derived from the sale of municipal (general obligation) bonds of the city of Tulsa. The bonds, from which the funds were derived, were sold prior to the institution of the action. No question of the validity of the bonds or of the obligation of the city to pay the same is presented in this action.
The funds involved were derived from two bond issues, authorized by a vote of the people at the same election on February 4, 1930. The aggregate amount derived from the sale of the bonds was $1,575,000;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kimball v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Bryar v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Verdine v. Cosden & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Jolly v. FieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Dyke v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Eckel v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- White v. WensauerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.