Legal Opinion

State v. Warner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 2007No. CC 9905-44488; CA A121246; SC S52880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

The principal issue in this case concerns the meaning and scope of ORS 153.108(1), 1 a statute that permits the state to prosecute separately a violation and a crime arising out of the same criminal episode, notwithstanding the general statutory prohibition on such prosecutions set out in ORS 131.515 (the “former jeopardy” statute). 2 Defendant contends that ORS 153.108(1) does not overcome that statutory former jeopardy bar when, as in this case, the state separately prosecutes a defendant for careless driving (ORS 811.135) (a traffic violation) and reckless driving (ORS 811.140) (a traffic…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. CrotsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. KizerOregon Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WhittenMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. JensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API