Legal Opinion

People v. Dal Porto

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1936No. Crim. 1495PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The defendant, together with one Eugene Ghilardueci and one Victor Genovali, was convicted on an information filed by the district attorney of the county of Stanislaus, on the 14th day of November, 1935, charging the defendants with conspiracy to possess and operate a still for the distillation and production of alcoholic liquors, without the same being then and there registered with the state board of equalization, and upon which no license therefor had been obtained or was applied for from the state board of equalization, etc. Count 2 charges the same defendants with conspiracy to possess…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Rossi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. People v. CreeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. People v. DowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hook v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Parks v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. BucchierreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. People v. DanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Dudley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API