Legal Opinion

Parker v. Bamberger

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1941No. 6178PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

In an opinion heretofore handed down by this court, appellants’ bill of exceptions was ordered stricken on the ground that Sec. 104-39-4, R. S. U. 1933, requires that a proposed bill must be presented to the judge for settlement within ten days from the date amendments are proposed by the adverse party or if no amendments are thus proposed, within ten days from the date the adverse party agrees that the bill may be settled as proposed. That decision is reported in, Utah, 101 P. 2d 372. Appellant petitioned for a rehearing on the ground that respondent’s motion to strike,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. White v. PinneyUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Russell v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Burns v. NaptonMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Houghton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1984
  2. Moore v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Lemmon v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Davis v. Illinois Terminal Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Platis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API