Gay v. Torrance
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION to the Supreme Court for a "Writ of Mandate to compel the settlement of a bill.of exceptions by the Judge of the Superior Court of San Diego County. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
The respondent as judge of the superior court rendered a judgment against the petitioner in an action for divorce in which she was the' plaintiff. In due time she proposed a bill of exceptions to be used in support of her motion for a new trial. On the 18th of February, 1904, and within the time allowed by order of the court, the defendant in the action served four hundred and seventeen proposed amendments to the proposed bill. The 28th of February falling on Sunday, the time allowed plaintiff for presentation of her proposed bill and the proposed amendments to the clerk for the judge (Code…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Black v. HillikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Whipple v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Houghton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Pendergrass v. CrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Gay v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Star Motor Imports, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Schroeder v. MauzyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Buis v. Lindauer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.