Russell v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of Cache County, First District; Hon. J. D. Gall, Judge. Action by C. B. Russell against the Borden’s Condensed Milk Company of Utah. ■ Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.
*459The plaintiff, as an employee of the defendant, obtained judgment against it for personal injuries, which, he alleges, were caused by defendant’s negligence.
The gist of the negligence alleged in the complaint is that the defendant was negligent in failing to provide proper and suitable tools and implements to move a certain machine, and that the same was moved in an improper, dangerous, and hazardous manner. The defenses interposed, which are now material are: (1) A denial of the alleged negligence; (2) contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff; and (3) assumption of risk.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pulos v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Busse v. Murray Meat & Live Stock Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1915
- Dunn v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1905
- Owens v. San Pedro, L. A. & S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
- Golesh v. Utah Apex Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. WimmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Davis v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Parker v. BambergerUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- Kaumans v. White Star Gas & Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
- Taylor v. Los Angeles & S. L. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.