Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stansfield

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2008No. 200,479-2PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

¶1 Mark Stansfield was admitted to the Washington State Bar in 1980 and was actively practicing law in 2003 when the cases underlying this matter began. Prior to these proceedings, he had no discipline history. A hearing officer found that he violated former RPC 1.2(f) (2002) by purporting to represent a person without authority and former RPC 1.9 (1993) by representing clients with adverse interests. The hearing officer recommended sanctions of a reprimand and admonition respectively. The Washington State Bar Association Disciplinary Board upheld the violations but recommended a six month…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Michael Crisp v. Jack R. Duckworth, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Disc. Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against EugsterWashington Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API