Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Berg

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtReid S. Moule, J.

The plaintiff, which issued a policy of insurance on the life of the above-named incompetent, moves for summary judgment on its first cause of action to rescind the accidental death benefit provision and on its second cause of action to rescind the waiver of premium after total disability provision.

The complaint alleges and the answer admits that the incompetent represented in his application for the policy that he had never received any disability benefits from any source, had not consulted or been treated by a physician for nervous or mental symptoms, and had not been treated by a physician…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eastern District Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Keck v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Keck v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Piccininni v. Ætna Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Essex Refining Corp. v. Home InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API