Legal Opinion

Essex Refining Corp. v. Home Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1975Published

1Opinion of the CourtRichard S. Lane, J.

In this action, tried before me and a jury, plaintiff was seeking to recover under a jewelers’ block policy for losses suffered in a burglary. The defense was material misrepresentations in the application for the policy. After completion of testimony, defendant moved to dismiss and I granted the motion.

Plaintiff by this motion asks me to recall my determination and order a new trial. Plaintiff’s moving papers offer nothing new factually or legally and, accordingly, the motion is denied.

Plaintiff’s misrepresentations were not in Item 17(e)(ll) of the application as argued in the moving…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eastern District Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Lindenbaum v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  3. Hartnett v. Home Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. BergNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API