Legal Opinion

Piccininni v. Ætna Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClose, J.

The action is upon a policy insuring against loss resulting directly and independently of all other causes from bodily injuries sustained during the term of the policy and effected solely through accidental means. The appellant recovered' judgment after a jury trial in the City Court of the City of New York, County of Queens. Upon appeal to the Appellate Term the judg*499ment was reversed and the complaint dismissed upon the ground that a false statement in the application for the policy materially affected the acceptance of the risk and the hazard assumed as a matter of law.

In our opinion it was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Denler v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christiania General Insurance Corporation of New York v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Leamy v. Berkshire Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Fernandez v. Windsor Life Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. BergNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Vander Veer v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API