Richardson v. Travelers Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
In 1926 appellant, then and now living in the state of California, made application to appellee for a policy of life insurance in the amount of $10,000 on a so-called “Uniform Premium Plan.” Through an alleged mistake of its officers and scriveners at its home office in Hartford, Connecticut, appellee issued appellant a $10,-000 policy known as a “Pension Policy, age 65.” The one difference between the policy alleged to have been applied for and the one issued is that under the latter the insured is entitled upon maturity to receive benefits in twice the amount afforded by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Wright v. Mutual Benefit Life Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Clement v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. HenriksenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
- Schiel v. New York Life Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Flax v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1957
- Itt Life Insurance Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation v. Naomi Farley, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.