Legal Opinion

McKinnie v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided February 2, 2018No. 2:17–cv–00048PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a putative class action brought by James and Lonnie McKinnie, and Larry and Tina Roberts on behalf of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company ("State Farm") insureds. The core claim is that State Farm refuses to pay prime contractor's overhead and profit associated with the estimated cost to reconstruct a structure where the covered loss is $25,000 or more.

State Farm has filed a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 29) that has been fully briefed by the parties (Doc. Nos. 30, 31 & 32). For the reasons that follow, the Motion will be granted…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graham Packaging Company, L.P. v. Ring Container Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
  2. Timothy Day v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API