Legal Opinion

LaPlant v. Snohomish County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 9, 2011No. 64281-2-IPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leach, A.C.J.

¶1 On discretionary review, we must decide whether a negligent training and supervision claim should be dismissed when an employer, against whom vicarious liability is also alleged, admits that its employees’ allegedly negligent conduct occurred within the scope of employment. We hold that the trial court should have dismissed Mario LaPlant’s cause of action for negligent training and supervision against Snohomish County because under the facts of this case, this claim is superfluous. Accordingly, we reverse.

FACTS

¶2 In June 2003, Snohomish County deputy sheriffs initiated and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Brown v. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Joyce v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Brownfield v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Garrison v. SagePoint Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Davis v. Clark CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
  4. Steven Petersen v. Lewis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Austin Stone, V King County, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2026

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API