Legal Opinion
Steven Petersen v. Lewis County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 3, 2016No. 14-35201UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Steven Petersen appeals' the district court’s grant of Lewis County’s (“the County”) and Matthew McKnight’s motion for summary judgment on qualified-immunity grounds in Petersen’s. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit arising from the shooting of his son. We have jurisdiction- under 28 ■ U.S.C. § 1291, and we review de novo the grant of summary judgment. See Fair Hous. Council of Riverside Cty., Inc. v. Riverside Two, 249 F.3d 1132, 1135 (9th Cir. 2001). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
The district court correctly found that there were material factual disputes regarding the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Amy Hughes v. Andrew KiselaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Hughes v. KiselaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016