Legal Opinion

Joseph v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2001No. S-8518PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A jailer owes its prisoners the duty of reasonable care to protect them from reasonably foreseeable harm, including self-inflicted harm. Rudolph Joseph committed suicide while he was imprisoned in a state jail. Was it error to require the jury in the resulting wrongful death case to excuse the state from its duty of reasonable care if the jury found that Joseph's suicide was intentional? We hold that it was, because intentional suicide is not a complete defense to a claim that a jailer negligently failed to prevent a prisoner's reasonably foreseeable…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Peter W. v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Estate of Belden v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  2. Evans v. McTaggartAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Reich v. Cominco Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Runyon v. Ass'n of Village Council PresidentsAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API