Legal Opinion

Vigue v. Noyes

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1976No. 12237-PRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Justice:

We granted this petition for review in order to clarify Arizona law relating to the liability of the possessor of a domestic animal other than a dog for injuries caused to third parties. The plaintiff-respondent, Mary Alice Vigue, a minor received serious injuries when she was kicked by a horse owned by the defendant-petitioner, Victor Noyes. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the respondent in the sum of $160,000, after which the trial court invited and granted a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Arizona Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bade v. DrachmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. Flynn Ex Rel. Eicke v. LindenfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Phelps Dodge Corporation v. FordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Swerdfeger v. KruegerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Utah Const. Co. v. BergArizona Supreme Court · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Armand Erpf EstateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Jones v. ManhartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. Dolezal v. CarbreyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. Diaz v. McMahonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Hojem v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API