Legal Opinion

Hiibschman Ex Rel. Welch v. City of Valdez

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1991No. S-3678, S-3679PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

INTRODUCTION

Heather Hiibschman sued the City of Valdez in tort for injuries incurred as she went over a ski bump-jump at a city ski hill. The superior court granted part of the City’s summary judgment motion and let part of Hiibschman’s ease go to the jury, which found against her. She appeals and the City cross-appeals, both primarily questioning the interpretation of Alaska’s 1980 Limitations on Claims Arising From Skiing Act (“Ski Act”), AS 09.65.135. 1

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Salmonberry Ridge, the only downhill ski facility in Valdez, opened to the public in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bachner v. PearsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State, Department of Highways v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Joseph v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Era Aviation, Inc. v. LindforsAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Jones v. Bowie Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Nutbrown v. Mount Cranmore, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API