Legal Opinion

State v. King

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 26, 1983No. C0-83-143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by the state from a dispositional sentencing departure in the form of a stay of execution of a presumptively executed prison term of 1 year and 1 day for the offense of attempted aggravated robbery. The offense is a severity level VII offense to which defendant, who has a criminal history score of zero, pleaded guilty. The sole issue is whether there was a valid basis for the departure. We hold that there was.

In State v. McClay, 310 N.W.2d 683 (Minn.1981), we upheld a durational departure in an aggravated robbery case because the robbery in question was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. STATE, CTY. OF HENNEPIN v. McClaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. State v. ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Jose Arriage Soto, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State v. SherwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. MalinskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. SolomonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. DietzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API