Legal Opinion
State v. Malinski
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 14, 1984No. C6-84-982PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
This is an appeal by the state from a dispositional departure by the trial court in the form of a stay of execution of sentence when the Minn. Sentencing Guidelines prescribe execution of sentence. The state also contends the trial court erred in not departing upward from the presumptive durational sentence. We affirm.
FACTS
From October 22, 1983 to December 22, 1983, respondent Arthur Robert Malinski, age 27, used a stolen Visa credit card to make purchases in 14 counties on at least 196 occasions, taking a total sum of $6,060.40. About $1,900.00 in stolen merchandise was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. HeywoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. HennessySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. LawCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. GebeckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. BendzulaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State of Minnesota, (A15-1247), (A15-1255) v. Randall Samuel Stempfley, (A15-1247), (A15-1255). A15-1247Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.