Legal Opinion

State v. Baeza

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 27, 1993No. 92-1439-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

Fernando Baeza appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his subsequent motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Baeza argues that he is entitled to withdraw his plea of guilty because the court did not inform him of the possible deportation consequences as required by sec. 971.08, Stats. Because Baeza is conclusively presumed to be deportable under federal law by pleading guilty to a violation of sec. 948.02(1), Stats., first-degree sexual assault of a child, and thus likely to be deported under sec. 971.08(2), we reverse the judgment and the trial court's order denying Baeza's motion.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  2. United States v. Tomas Rodriguez, Also Known as Tomas Rodriguez-Ledezma, Also Known as Tomas Ledezma RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Edwin AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Wilson v. Waukesha CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  5. State v. SantosCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. DouangmalaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. DalmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. NegreteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. Tuan Quoc NguyenHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. MalcolmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API