Legal Opinion

State v. Dalman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1994No. Cr. 940034, 940035PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

Donald and Paulette Dalman, husband and wife, seeking post-conviction relief, appeal from the district court orders denying their motions to withdraw their pleas of guilty. We dismiss Donald’s appeal, and affirm the district court order denying Paulette’s motion to withdraw her guilty plea.

Donald and Paulette Dalman, Canadian citizens, were charged with six counts of class B felony security violations on February 27, 1992. Originally, both Donald and Paulette were represented by the same court-appointed attorney. In mid-March 1992, they each retained the same private…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FrometaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. State v. OlsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Tafoya v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. ChungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  5. State v. McDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Abdi v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Mertz v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. Tuan Quoc NguyenHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API