Legal Opinion

State v. Santos

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 27, 1987No. 86-0761-CRPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

Jose Santos appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty pleas because of ineffective assistance of counsel. The issue is whether trial counsel’s failure to inform defendant of the immigration consequences of his conviction constitutes ineffective assistance. We conclude that defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel was not required to advise him of these collateral consequences. We therefore affirm.

Defendant is a Cuban who arrived in the United States as part of the Mariel boatlift in June, 1980. He *530pled guilty to three counts…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. Monica Joyce CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. FeltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. United States v. ParrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. State v. BolligWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Warren v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. FrometaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Jose C. Santos v. Darrell A. Kolb, Superintendent, Fox Lake Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API