Legal Opinion

Di Santo v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 3, 1927No. 288PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Plaintiff in error was indicted in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, for a violation of an Act of the Legislature of July 17, 1919, as amended by the Act of May 20, 1921, P. L. 997, requiring licenses to sell steamship tickets or orders for transportation to or from foreign countries. The indictment alleged that, December 14, 1921, without having obtained a license so to do, plaintiff in error held himself out as authorized to sell tickets and orders for transportation as agent of certain steamship companies, and that he engaged in thé sale of such tickets. There…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Shafer v. Farmers Grain Co. of EmbdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. McCall v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Texas Transport & Terminal Co. v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API