Legal Opinion

Glover v. Midland Mortgage Co. of Oklahoma, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided December 7, 1998No. CV 98-BU-1211-SPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

BUTTRAM, District Judge.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(a), the district court may “at any time prior to final judgment” remand a case to state court if “it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.” The court also notes that it is free, at any time during the proceedings of a case to evaluate its subject matter jurisdiction. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3). 1 Upon reviewing the file, the court determines that jurisdiction is lacking and the matter will be REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama. 2

The district court earlier…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
  2. Wynn Ex Rel. Alabama v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1999
  3. Superior Bank v. Hilsman (In Re Hilsman)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2006
  4. Puritan Lace Mfg. Co. v. Perfect Home, L.L.C. (In Re Perfect Home L.L.C. EIN: 63-1090549)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1999
  5. ABS Ins., Ltd. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API