Rohanna v. Vazzana
Supreme Court of Virginia
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.
These appeals involve separate suits Instituted for the purpose of enforcing mechanics’ liens. The facts and circumstances are the same in each suit, and by agreement they were consolidated on appeal. One case grows out of work performed by appellees on the home of appellants located in the city of Norfolk, and the other involves the construction of a new dwelling by appellees for appellants in Norfolk county.
Judgments were obtained against the Rohannas by Vazzana Brothers as general contractors amounting to $11,589.19 on the new construction in the county, and $9,533.88 for the remodeling of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burch v. Grace Street Building Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- F. S. Bowen Electric Co. v. FoleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
- Nicholas v. Harrisonburg Building & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1943
3Cited by39 opinions
- LOFTON RIDGE v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
- P. M. Palumbo, Jr., M.D., Inc. v. BennettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Cohen v. MAYFLOWER COPR.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- Sellers v. BlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- Ring v. PoelmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.