Legal Opinion
Laurino v. Laurino
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 30, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
28 N.J. Super. 119 (1953)
100 A.2d 301
MARIA FELICIA LAURINO, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS MARY F. LAURINO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ENRICO LAURINO, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS EDWARD LAURINO, DOMINICK E. LAURINO AND MARCELLA LAURINO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 13, 1953.
Decided October 30, 1953.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Maurice A. Potter argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Potter & Fisher, attorneys).
Mr. John Warren, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Parsons, Labrecque, Canzona & Combs, attorneys).
The opinion of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cook v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Peff v. PeffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Isserman v. IssermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Tami v. PikowitzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
- Semenowich v. MelnykSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Paterson v. SchneiderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Heritage Bank, NA v. RuhNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Untermann v. UntermannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Morrison v. MorrisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Prudential Insurance v. JacksonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994