Legal Opinion

City of Paterson v. Schneider

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 11, 1954PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

31 N.J. Super. 598 (1954)

107 A.2d 553

THE CITY OF PATERSON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ALBERT SCHNEIDER AND JACQUELINE SCHNEIDER, HIS WIFE, SCHNEIDER SILK MILLS, INC., AND ANNA SCHNEIDER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued July 12, 1954.

Decided August 11, 1954.

Before Judges LLOYD, WAESCHE and HANEMAN.

Mr. Saul M. Mann argued the cause for the appellants.

Mr. Ervan F. Kushner argued the cause for the respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by HANEMAN, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Plaintiff herein…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. A. Hollander & Son, Inc. v. Imperial Fur Blending Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  5. Neubeck v. NeubeckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. MarinelloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  2. Garnick v. SerewitchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Feldman v. Urban Commercial, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  4. Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  5. United Stations of Nj v. Wm. KingsleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API