Tami v. Pikowitz
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
In several of its aspects this cause is an unfashionable one to be introduced to a court of equity for determination. Basically it pertains to the title and possession of a Plymouth automobile which, in the existing industrial conditions, is alleged to be a rare and unique article of personalty. Vide, however, Burr v.Bloomsburg, 101 N.J. Eq. 615; 138 Atl. Rep. 876. In retaining jurisdiction I have preferred to recognize the suit as one prosecuted to nullify a bill of sale alleged to have been procured fraudulently and without consideration.
The controversy recoils from the indiscretions of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Neubeck v. NeubeckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Burr v. BloomsburgNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Letts v. LettsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rumbauskas v. CantorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- United Board & Carton Corp. v. BrittingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Sipko v. Koger, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Casini v. LuponeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Feldman v. Urban Commercial, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.