Legal Opinion

Tami v. Pikowitz

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 30, 1946No. Docket 147/174PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In several of its aspects this cause is an unfashionable one to be introduced to a court of equity for determination. Basically it pertains to the title and possession of a Plymouth automobile which, in the existing industrial conditions, is alleged to be a rare and unique article of personalty. Vide, however, Burr v.Bloomsburg, 101 N.J. Eq. 615; 138 Atl. Rep. 876. In retaining jurisdiction I have preferred to recognize the suit as one prosecuted to nullify a bill of sale alleged to have been procured fraudulently and without consideration.

The controversy recoils from the indiscretions of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neubeck v. NeubeckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  2. Burr v. BloomsburgNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Letts v. LettsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rumbauskas v. CantorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. United Board & Carton Corp. v. BrittingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Sipko v. Koger, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  4. Casini v. LuponeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. Feldman v. Urban Commercial, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API