Semenowich v. Melnyk
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 93 N. J. Eq. 67.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swaxze, J.
This is substantially an application for surplus money after a decree setting aside a conveyance as in fraud of creditors and ordering a sale of the property to satisfy the debt. The application. is made in advance of sale in order that the parties entitled to the surplus may know how much they may bid to protect their interests. No objection is made to this procedure. In fact the •first application to) the court for instructions was made by Novak, the present appellant. He raises no objection and we think, therefore, we may properly deal…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sayre v. LembergerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blaine v. KrysowatyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- Central-Penn, Bank v. N.J. FidelityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Smith v. BarnesOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Laurino v. LaurinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- McAllister v. McAllister Coal Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.